

Presenter removes the background entirely and places you like the weatherperson on your desktop, and meeting participants see you when you screenshare. This enables added privacy and security when you're on webcam on a video call. The only problem is, since it's a free version, there is a huge watermark appearing every 30 seconds. I can have cool backgrounds in my zoom meetings. I don't have a physical greenscreen and yet it works almost flawlessly. I use Zoom with my other clients, and the background is locally processed rather than being a cloud service so this isn't a problem there. ChromaCam allows you to replace your background within your video box in WebEx, Zoom, etc. So, tldr, I downloaded the free version of chromacam and it's been amazing. It appears that the upstream bandwidth required to send video up to (Chromacam hosting) and back down is impairing the basic meeting functionality. I had to switch from the Chromacam virtual camera back to my physical webcam to restore continuity of the meeting I was hosting. The meeting had about a dozen participants, sharing a screen and using cloud recording. It is currently showing as in Beta-testing, and I had 200 Mbps down/20 Mbps upload broadband, and recently I'd had several meetings where the video/audio began breaking up. If you are an attendee joining someone else's meeting (you do not have your own GoTo Connect account), you can download ChromaCam Lite for free.
CAMMASK VS CHROMACAM PRO
Aside from the relatively robust hardware requirements (which I've met), I'm wondering if anyone has had Internet bandwidth issues using this feature. If you have a paid GoTo Connect account, you can use your GoTo Connect credentials to download and access ChromaCam Pro for free. I have been hosting meetings for my clients for about 9 months and decided to try the GoToMeeting Hub Virtual Background.
